Source: Apakabar July, 12nd 2002
Author: Tjan Swie Yong
Some years ago the labor disputes occurred in the Shangrila Hotel and management decided to close the hotel and of course with huge losses. What reason? The reason for the dispute is so close and with jeleknya hotel deems better than not closed. Hotelpun employees lost their jobs and the country where employment is very small, so this is a creation of employment opportunities. Of course, the losses suffered bermilyar Rupiah very heavy, but that the rich do not close mempedulikansebab business is legitimate, and may be a solution that can be considered good. What is considered good? For the other for the hospitality, this is to give an example so that labor does not make offhand strikes. There are allegations that the strikes are controlled by labor organizations to pressure employers. In fact every problem can be well and take the basic WIN WIN SOLUTION, why not do? Entahlah why, but it may be assumed that the walkout DISEASES really meresahkan terms of business. By closing and opening again dikemudian day laborers with a new and improved management that will avoid the long-larutnya problems. Business case for the hospitality business to help deems Shangrila hotel yanglain and things such as going on in Shangrila Hotel can avoided, at least to give lessons that hostility between labor and effort are very detrimental and “rack” with the strike will not necessarily reach the target, which is the welfare of laborers better.
